Value Proposition - PowerAgent Network

The PowerAgent Automation Network is open for use by any client protocol seeking to incorporate open-source, generalised, permission-less, autonomous, decentralised, configurable, cost-effective and secure automation into their on-chain products and services.

PowerAgent Network:

Open source codebase

  • Open to inspection by client protocols and their users at any time
  • Shared with an increasing number of other client protocols, all participating in audits and testing
  • Open to being extended by all protocols using the network

Generalised functionality

  • Supports an expanding number of basic event-driven functionalities
  • Reduces client protocols' need to code, audit and maintain
  • Task-specific signer set requirements scale from low value, low penalty to very high value, high penalty tasks


  • Anyone can join the PowerAgent Network as a node/keeper simply by staking sufficient $CVP
  • Any (EVM compliant) protocols can choose to use the Network, initially on EVM-compliant L1/L2s
  • Client protocols can increase/decrease their signer set credentials requirements by task, at any time
  • Nodes/keepers can increase or reduce their signer set credentials at any time


  • PowerAgent task execution is totally independent of the client protocol, increasing trust and reducing points of failure
  • Users of client protocols are able to independently audit and monitor tasks, even become Network node operators
  • Nodes operating on a given EVM-compliant L1/L2 are totally independent of other chains/layers


  • Client protocols can specify the minimum number of independent nodes/keepers in their task-specific signer sets
  • No single point of failure or dependencies in the PowerAgent automation network
  • No upper limits on numbers of nodes/keepers or client protocols


  • Event triggers, task specifications and minimum signing requirements defined task by task by client protocols
  • Chronological events...(?)
  • Oracle-based calculations (?) stored state? e.g. rebalancing example: take the worst performing token in the basket, sell half and buy more of all the other tokens in the basket?


  • Fees defined task-by-task independent of market conditions, leading to lower costs, and more predictable task execution for users
  • Fees can be varied based on other evaluated conditionality(?)


  • Competition between increasing numbers of nodes/keepers make it virtually impossible for bad actors to act alone or in collusion
  • Usage by ever-more protocols across ever-more EVM L1/L2 chains/layers contributes to continuously hardening codebase